I can't decide about the death penalty. I've thought about this for so many years, and I've switched from one side to the other so many times (ditto for abortion, the existence of God, wanting to have children, and peanut butter (how did I ever not love peanut butter?)) and I wonder if I'll ever actually make up my mind.
On the one hand, I believe in compassion. I whole heartedly believe in compassion. I think it is the single most important driving force in a life well lived. The Dalai Lama says compassion does not come from feeling sympathetic to your friends when they are in distress. That is attachment. Sure, it can be compassion too, but he was talking about compassion on a larger scale and so am I. I'm talking about compassion for strangers. Not just people you walk past on the street, not just the homeless man begging for change on the L Train. Compassion for people you will never see face to face. Compassion for the world in general, for all humanity, for all life.
I struggle with this, of course. I hate people! I hate the crowded subways; I hate the men that leer at me when I walk down the street; I hate the people who won't get the F out of my way when I'm walking on the sidewalk! I eat meat. I use too much paper. But every day I start with the greatest intentions of living life as a compassionate being. It's easier to be compassionate to people you know because there is some direct benefit in doing it: they may, in return, deal compassionately with you. It is harder to exert the effort with someone you do not think will have substantial effect on your life. This is something I will have to work on in this life and the next.
When I think about compassionate living, I think the death penalty is wrong. It does not deter crime any more than prison deters it. It may help keep the honest people honest, but anyone bent on doing evil, will do it regardless of consequence. I do not think it is within the jurisdiction of any human to take the life of another. I do not think it suitable retribution for any crime; killing the murderer doesn't bring back the victim. And on a metaphysical level, I think it is bad karma for a society to wantonly kill others.
But I also believe in justice. Not necessarily an eye for an eye. I feel that philosophy is immature. But I believe that everyone must own up to their actions, even if they're accidents (Rebecca Gayheart runs over a kid and serves no time; Martha Stewart sells her stock on an inside tip and goes to jail for six months...yeah, that seems fair). Does motive really count for anything or is it only the end result that matters? Hypothetically, if a man rapes and kills a girl, such an action not only affects that girl's life, but also the lives of those who knew the girl. The girl will never grow up, fall in love, have children, have a career, drive a car—anything. And her parents will never really overcome the loss of their daughter. It seems fitting that he should die for such a reprehensible offense. Not only as punishment, but as prevention. What if he is paroled or escapes and kills again? How many chances does someone get? Doesn't "life in prison" where you don't have to worry about food or shelter (hey, I'm not saying it's Club Med) seem like a rather picayune trade off for ending a girl's life?
A friend once said he believed in capital punishment because if a person is in a community pool and starts bullying the other swimmers, that guy loses his pool privileges. This makes sense to me. But do we just put him in a pool with other bad kids or do we never let him in another pool again?
I wish we all got exactly what we deserved. I often wonder, if I did get what I deserved, would my life be better or worse than it is today? I feel like it would actually be about what it is. I think I'm a good person most of the time, but I also feel like I am a long way from being the kind of person I would like to be.
I believe is compassion and justice equally and I'm not sure how to reconcile the two. When it comes to capital punishment, it seems like they are at opposite ends of the spectrum. How far does compassion go? Does it go on infinitely? Even when someone shows no remorse, no sense of wrong-doing, no desire to mend their ways? The Dalai Lama would say yes. Compassion should be infinite. And for that matter, Jesus says it as well: Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?" Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times." (Mark 18:21-25) But we're cynical people; we don't want to be duped. When we forgive someone, when we give them a second chance, it is so they can prove to us they have learned a lesson. And if they don't learn it, if they only repeat their offenses, we will feel taken advantage of. We hate being taken advantage of. It seems like it's just easier to kill them, than to risk being humiliated.
At least I know how I feel about peanut butter.