data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cae6/9cae62a5eb366143c923c08c0cc934e3534a11c0" alt=""
Snowman called this the Straw Paradox, which is something to the effect of, some things might as well be used--even if you're morally opposed--because otherwise they'll just be thrown away.
This was a no-meat day for me (for those of you who don't know, I alternate days of not eating meat) so I order a salad, hold the bacon.
They don't hold the bacon. I say to the waitress, "This has bacon on it." She whisks it away.
But then we discuss: What's more important? That I don't eat meat on a no-meat day or that I don't waste the salad they gave me which they're just going to throw away? I mean, the pig is dead and the bacon is cooked.
I can't decide before my new salad arrives. With no egg, but still with bacon.
I say to Snowman, "What? I hadn't come to a conclusion about the Straw Paradox yet! I'm not ready to be tempted!"
I say to the waitress, "This still has bacon on it." I say it more because they got the order wrong twice and I want them to know it (although, the service is usually spot on).
I finally get the right salad, but I feel badly because I've wasted two and the pig is dead, dead, dead whether I choose to eat it or not.
This how I made my peace with the Straw Paradox: I'm not a vegetarian, and until I become a full-timer, if I ever receive a meal with meat in it, I'm going to eat it, because at this point I think it's more important not to waste the food than to stick to my princple not to eat it.
3 comments:
I wouldn't worry about wasting the food... at every restaurant I worked for, both salads would have been inhaled by the servers in the kitchen. Those people are vultures!!
I was JUST going to say that- the meat & salad would totally be eaten, so actually you did a very humanitarian thing by donating food to some very hungry wait staff =)
I like the conclusion you seem to have arrived at. I agree with it.
Post a Comment